Real-life use of ceftobiprole for severe infections in a French intensive care unit.

Ceftobiprole (CBP) is an anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cephalosporin with a wide spectrum of activity. We aimed to describe our experience of real-life use of CBP for the treatment of severe infections of critically ill patients with multiple infected sites and related trough CBP concentrations. We performed a retrospective, observational, monocentric study in our intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients treated with CBP for documented infections between January 2016 and December 2021. We collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data. When available, we report the CBP trough concentrations. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the end of treatment. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and documentation of the carriage of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria not present before CBP treatment. Between January 2016 and December 2021, 47 patients were treated in the ICU with CBP. The main indication for treatment was pneumonia (51%) and most patients presented with associated bacteremia (72%). All infections were polymicrobial. A clinical cure was achieved for nearly 80% of the patients. Only five patients presented new carriage of MDR bacteria. In-hospital mortality was 32%. Out of 21 strains of Enterobacterales for which the MIC was available, 33% were considered to be resistant to CBP according to the EUCAST 2023 clinical breakpoint. Trough CBP concentrations were reported for 16 patients. In our real-life experience, treatment of ICU patients with CBP for polymicrobial severe infections resulted in most cases in a clinical cure. Monitoring of trough concentrations is critical, especially in cases of high MIC.

Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates derived from severe pneumonia: a retrospective monocentre study.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is endowed with a repertoire of virulence factors potentially implicated in its pathogenicity and ability to cause invasive disease. The main objective of this study was to describe the bacterial genotype, including virulence genes and affiliation to clonal complexes (CCs), encountered in severe pneumonia. METHODS: DNA microarray was used to analyse 18 S. aureus isolates from patients hospitalized with severe pneumonia between 2017 and 2019. RESULTS: Among 18 S. aureus isolates, 14 were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and 4 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). There were 14 community-acquired, 3 healthcare-associated, and 1 hospital-acquired infections. Different radiological presentations were observed: necrotizing pneumonia (n = 8, 44%), alveolar consolidation (n = 7, 39%), alveolar-interstitial infiltrates (n = 3, 17%). Sixteen patients (89%) required ICU hospitalization, 13 (72%) an invasive mechanical ventilation, and 12 (67%) a vasopressor support. Mortality affected 6 patients (33%). Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxic shock syndrome toxine-1 (TSST-1) encoding genes were documented in nine (50%), 12 (67%), one (6%) of the isolates, respectively. Accessory regulator gene group I was the most reported (n = 9, 50%) and was found in five deaths. The majority of isolates were affiliated to CC152 (n = 6), followed by CC15 (n = 3), CC45 (n = 2), CC30 (n = 2), CC1 (n = 2), CC8 (n = 1), CC9 (n = 1), and CC25 (n = 1). All the CC152 isolates were PVL-positive. CONCLUSION: CC152-PVL positive S. aureus strains were the most prevalent in severe pneumonia. Other virulence gene profiles were found coupled to additional clonal lineages. A genotyping strategy contributes to describe the current circulating strains and bacterial genetic backgrounds.

Bacterial and viral co-infections in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to a French ICU.

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of bacterial and viral co-infections among patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are lacking. We aimed to assess the rate of bacterial and viral co-infections, as well as to report the most common micro-organisms involved in patients admitted to the ICU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this monocenter retrospective study, we reviewed all the respiratory microbiological investigations performed within the first 48 h of ICU admission of COVID-19 patients (RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2) admitted for acute respiratory failure. RESULTS: From March 13th to April 16th 2020, a total of 92 adult patients (median age: 61 years, 1st-3rd quartiles [55-70]; males: n = 73/92, 79%; baseline SOFA: 4 [3-7] and SAPS II: 31 [21-40]; invasive mechanical ventilation: n = 83/92, 90%; ICU mortality: n = 45/92, 49%) were admitted to our 40-bed ICU for acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Among them, 26 (28%) were considered as co-infected with a pathogenic bacterium at ICU admission with no co-infection related to atypical bacteria or viruses. The distribution of the 32 bacteria isolated from culture and/or respiratory PCRs was as follows: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10/32, 31%), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 7/32, 22%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 6/32, 19%), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5/32, 16%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2/32, 6%), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 1/32, 3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1/32, 3%). Among the 24 pathogenic bacteria isolated from culture, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporin and to amoxicillin-clavulanate combination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report on a 28% rate of bacterial co-infection at ICU admission of patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia, mostly related to Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterobacteriaceae. In French patients with confirmed severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia requiring ICU admission, our results encourage the systematic administration of an empiric antibiotic monotherapy with a 3rd generation cephalosporin, with a prompt de-escalation as soon as possible. Further larger studies are needed to assess the real prevalence and the predictors of co-infection together with its prognostic impact on critically ill patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Phenotypic and genotypic quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli underlining GyrA83/87 mutations as a target to detect ciprofloxacin resistance.

BACKGROUND: Quinolone resistance (QR) is one component of the MDR emerging in Escherichia coli and is of particular concern given the widespread use of fluoroquinolones. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the QR phenotypes and genotypes in E. coli responsible for bloodstream infections and to propose molecular determinants that could be targeted to predict ciprofloxacin resistance. METHODS: E. coli isolates from blood cultures in three French hospitals were studied for quinolone MICs and characterization of genotypic QR determinants (QRg). RESULTS: Among 507 isolates tested for MICs, 148 (29.2%) were resistant to quinolones based on EUCAST breakpoints and 143 (28.2%) harboured at least one QRg. QRg were mainly mutations in the QRDR (138 isolates, 27.2%), with 55.8% of these isolates carrying at least three QRDR mutations. gyrA mutations predominated (92.8%) followed by parC (61.6%), parE (32.6%) and gyrB (1.4%) mutations. Only 4.7% of the isolates harboured a plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) gene: aac(6')-Ib-cr (60.0%) or qnr (qnrS, qnrB) (32.0%). For the first time in France, we reported the qepA4 allele of the plasmid-encoded efflux pump QepA. Only five isolates carried PMQR without a QRDR mutation. The positive predictive value (PPV) for ciprofloxacin resistance was 100% for any QRg and 99.2% for gyrA mutations specifically. CONCLUSIONS: QR observed in E. coli isolates involved in bloodstream infections is still mainly due to QRDR mutations, especially at codons GyrA83/87, which could be used as a molecular target to rapidly detect resistance.

Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae bacteremia: a challenging diagnosis!

Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, a Gram-positive bacillus, is reported to cause for cutaneous infections and endocarditis. We report a case of E. rhusiopathiae bacteremia without severe clinical illness. The patient, a 74-year-old man, is suffering from a chronic lymphoid leukemia (LLC). Following a trauma, the patient developed a bruise on the left inch. Because the site of shock seemed clinically infected, oral amoxicilline-acid clavulanic (AAC) treatment was started after withdrawn 1 set of blood cultures. These blood culture specimens yielded a Gram-positive bacillus identified as E. rhusiopathiae by mass spectrometry MALDI-TOF (Microflex Brüker). The strain was sensitive to beta-lactam, fluoroquinolones and macrolides, resistant to vancomycin (natural resistance), and amikacin but sensitive to gentamicin. After 5 days of treatment by AAC, the patient became apyretic. One year after this episode, we reported no further symptoms of infection, or endocarditis. The natural resistance of E. rhusiopathiae in glycopeptides underlines the importance of a microbiological diagnosis. Indeed, vancomycine can be the treatment of first intention in Gram-positive bacillus bacteremia. The identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry is available the same day of the blood culture positivity and allows to prescribe the most adapted antibiotic treatment for the patient.

Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates (2010 to 2014) in France Characterized by Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Two extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates were discovered among 6,340 (0.03%) French isolates between 2010 and 2014. One isolate corresponded to the F89 multidrug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolate harboring a penA mosaic; whole-genome sequencing highlighted an additional R251H substitution in the ftsX gene recently involved in cephalosporin resistance. The other, ceftriaxone-resistant isolate (MIC, 0.25 mg/liter) harbored the PBP2 pattern XXXVI plus a P551S substitution and belonged to sequence type ST1579 (multilocus sequence typing [MLST]).

Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in France during 2013-14.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and mechanisms of azithromycin resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae French isolates from 2013 to 2014. METHODS: N. gonorrhoeae samples isolated in a network of laboratories were tested for susceptibility to azithromycin between April 2013 and March 2014. Fifty-four isolates that were non-susceptible to azithromycin and 18 susceptible isolates were characterized for molecular mechanisms of resistance by PCR/sequencing and genotyped using N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST). RESULTS: Among the 970 N. gonorrhoeae isolates, 54 (5.56%) were non-susceptible to azithromycin, 9 (1%) were resistant and 45 (4.6%) showed intermediate resistance. Azithromycin-non-susceptible isolates harboured a C2599T mutation in the rrl gene encoding the 23S rRNA alleles (5.5%), a C substitution in the mtrR promoter (5.5%), an A deletion in the mtrR promoter (53.7%) and mutations in the L4 ribosomal protein (14.8%) and in the MtrR repressor (25.9%). No isolates showed an L22 mutation or carried an erm, ere, mef(A)/(E) or mphA gene. Thirty different STs were highlighted using the NG-MAST technique. The predominant genogroups non-susceptible to azithromycin were G21 (31%), G1407 (20%) and G2400 (15%). Genogroup G2400 (15%) was revealed to be a novel cluster prevalent in the south of France and resistant to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that the prevalence of resistance of N. gonorrhoeae to azithromycin in France is low and essentially due to multiple genetic mutations. Its dissemination occurs through three major genogroups including a novel one in France (G2400).

Could the DiversiLab® semi-automated repetitive-sequence-based PCR be an acceptable technique for typing isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa? An answer from our experience and a review of the literature.

Recently the DiversiLab® (DL) system (bioMérieux) was developed as an automated platform that uses repetitive element polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) technology for standardized, reproducible DNA fingerprinting of bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of DL rep-PCR for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. The performance of DL rep-PCR was compared with that of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in a prospective multicenter study of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa, conducted in 3 intensive care units over a 31-month period. In total, 203 P. aeruginosa isolates from 66 patients, from whom at least 2 consecutive respiratory samples each were collected more than 48 h apart, were typed using DL rep-PCR. Forty isolates (corresponding to 20 patients) were also typed using PFGE of SpeI-digested DNA. The typeability was 100% with DL rep-PCR and 95% with PFGE. The discriminatory power was close for DL rep-PCR and for PFGE (Simpson's diversity indices of 0.901 and 0.947, respectively). Insufficient agreement between DL rep-PCR and PFGE typing results was observed for the 40 selected isolates (adjusted Rand coefficient of 0.419), mostly due to isolates of the same DL rep-PCR type but of different PFGE types (adjusted Wallace coefficients of 0.306 for DL rep-PCR with PFGE, and of 0.667 for PFGE with DL rep-PCR). Considered together with published data, DL rep-PCR results should be interpreted with caution for the investigation of outbreaks caused by P. aeruginosa and evaluated in conjunction with epidemiological data.

Imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem to treat patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Only limited data exist on Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) treated with imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem. Therefore, we conducted a prospective observational study in 169 patients who developed Pseudomonas aeruginosa VAP. Imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem MICs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were determined using Etests and compared according to the carbapenem received. Among the 169 isolates responsible for the first VAP episode, doripenem MICs were lower (P<0.0001) than those of imipenem and meropenem (MIC50s, 0.25, 2, and 0.38, respectively); 61%, 64%, and 70% were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem, respectively (P was not statistically significant). Factors independently associated with carbapenem resistance were previous carbapenem use (within 15 days) and mechanical ventilation duration before VAP onset. Fifty-six (33%) patients had at least one VAP recurrence, and 56 (33%) died. Factors independently associated with an unfavorable outcome (recurrence or death) were a high day 7 sequential organ failure assessment score and mechanical ventilation dependency on day 7. Physicians freely prescribed a carbapenem to 88 patients: imipenem for 32, meropenem for 24, and doripenem for 32. The remaining 81 patients were treated with various antibiotics. Imipenem-, meropenem-, and doripenem-treated patients had similar VAP recurrence rates (41%, 25%, and 22%, respectively; P=0.15) and mortality rates (47%, 25%, and 22%, respectively; P=0.07). Carbapenem resistance emerged similarly among patients treated with any carbapenem. No carbapenem was superior to another for preventing carbapenem resistance emergence.